A midfielder can finish with 35 disposals and still have less influence than a forward who touches the ball 18 times. That is the problem a player-rating system tries to solve: not just counting what happened, but judging how much a player’s actions mattered.
In Australian Rules Football, “the rating system” most often refers to the AFL Player Ratings, developed with Champion Data. It is a statistical measure of individual contribution, used to compare players and track performance. It is not the same as the Brownlow Medal, coaches’ votes, or fantasy-football scoring—and its detailed formula is not fully public.
What AFL Player Ratings measure
Basic statistics tell you what a player did: gather a possession, lay a tackle, take a mark or kick a goal. Ratings try to account for the value and context of those actions. A disposal that breaks a line and creates a scoring chance can matter more than a safe sideways kick. A contested mark in the defensive 50 may be more important than an uncontested mark in space.
The system also considers actions that do not always show up in a player’s disposal count. Pressure, contests, spoils and defensive work can all contribute to a player’s performance. Conversely, a possession that gives the ball away or puts a teammate under pressure may count against the player. The exact weight assigned to each event is determined by the system, rather than by a simple public points chart.
In broad terms, ratings are designed to reflect a player’s influence on the game, not merely how often they get near the ball. They are a useful lens, but they are still a model of performance—not a complete description of football intelligence, leadership or effort.
How a rating is built
During a match, the system records player actions and evaluates their contribution. The value of an action depends partly on its outcome and partly on the situation. For example, a kick forward that finds a teammate in a dangerous position is likely to be more valuable than one that sends the ball to a contest with little chance of advantage.
Think of two midfielders in the same game. One racks up plenty of uncontested handballs but rarely moves the ball into a threatening area. The other has fewer touches, wins the ball under pressure, then delivers inside 50 and helps set up a shot. A raw possession tally may favour the first player; a context-based rating may reward the second more heavily.
Ratings can also reflect mistakes and missed opportunities. A turnover in the defensive half can hurt a player’s assessment because it may expose the team to a scoring chance. A missed tackle or a failure to apply pressure can matter even if the player never records a disposal. That does not mean every error is treated alike: location, match situation and what happens next can affect its significance.
The rating is therefore better understood as a running assessment of contribution than as a reward for each statistical event. It does not work like a simple rule such as “one point for a mark” or “six points for a goal.”
Game ratings, season rankings and other measures
It helps to separate a player’s rating for one match from their position in a broader ranking. A match rating describes their contribution in that game. Season and career lists compare players across multiple matches, using the ratings accumulated or averaged over the relevant period. The precise leaderboard and reporting method can vary, so check whether a list is showing a single-game result, a season total or an average.
Those figures are also different from several other familiar AFL measures:
| Measure | What it represents | How it differs from player ratings |
|---|---|---|
| AFL Player Ratings | A statistical assessment of a player’s contribution and impact | Uses the context and value of actions, not just a count of basic statistics |
| Brownlow Medal votes | Umpires’ votes for the best players in each match, under the medal’s rules | A voting award, not a continuously calculated statistical rating |
| Coaches’ votes | Votes awarded by the coaches after each game | Relies on coaches’ judgement rather than the ratings model |
| Fantasy or SuperCoach scores | Scores calculated for fantasy competitions | Uses competition-specific scoring rules, which may value actions differently |
These systems can agree that a player had a strong game, but they do not have to. A player might receive votes for decisive moments while another scores well through steady work across the match. Neither result automatically proves the other measure is wrong; they are answering different questions.
What ratings are good for—and what they miss
Ratings are handy when you want to look beyond headline numbers. They can help explain why a player with fewer disposals had a major impact, or why a high-possession game was less influential than it first appeared. Across a season, they also offer a consistent way to compare performances under the same broad framework.
But no single rating can capture everything that matters on a football field. A forward might lead defenders away from a teammate, creating space without touching the ball. A ruckman may direct a tap to the right area, enabling a clearance that another player records. A defender can hold a dangerous opponent quiet, though the rating may not fully show the tactical value of that matchup. Team structure, role and opponent also matter.
Use ratings alongside match footage, the player’s role and ordinary statistics. If a number surprises you, ask what it is measuring before deciding it is a verdict on the player. A rating is evidence to consider—not a substitute for watching the game.
Related Articles
- How Does the Australian Rules Football Ranking System Work?
- How Does the Clock Work in Australian Rules Football?
- How Does a Round-Robin Format Work in Australian Rules Football?
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the AFL Player Ratings formula public?
No. The system’s broad purpose and the kinds of actions it considers are described publicly, but the detailed formula and weightings are proprietary. That makes it difficult to reproduce a rating from a box score alone.
Does the player with the highest rating always win the Brownlow?
No. AFL Player Ratings and Brownlow voting are separate measures. The Brownlow is decided by umpires’ votes under its own rules, while player ratings are generated using a statistical model. They may identify the same standout, but they are not designed to match exactly.
Can a player have a big disposal count but a modest rating?
Yes. A high number of possessions does not guarantee that those possessions were especially influential. Their location, outcome and effect on the contest can matter, as can the player’s work without the ball.
Are AFL ratings the same as fantasy-football scores?
No. Fantasy competitions use their own scoring rules to turn match actions into points. AFL Player Ratings aim to assess contribution to football performance, so a player’s rating and fantasy score can differ substantially.
Final Thoughts
The AFL Player Ratings system looks beyond the basic box score, weighing the impact and context of what players do during a match. It can reveal value that a possession tally misses, but it cannot capture every tactical or off-ball contribution. Read it as one useful measure of performance, then pair it with the game itself.
Aiden Cross is a sports writer and editor at BeliveSports, covering a broad range of sports with a focus on clear, accurate, and practical information. His work covers rules, techniques, player roles, competitions, equipment, statistics, and the details that help readers better understand how different sports are played. Aiden takes a research-driven approach to sports writing, using reliable sources and established sporting information to provide context rather than simply repeating surface-level facts. His goal is to make complex topics accessible while maintaining the accuracy and depth expected by knowledgeable sports fans. At BeliveSports, Aiden contributes to the site’s editorial standards by focusing on accuracy, clarity, useful context, and reader-first explanations.
1 thought on “How Does the Rating System Work in Australian Rules Football?”